From: | Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Off-list Re: Alternatives to Dell? |
Date: | 2004-12-13 17:19:24 |
Message-ID: | x7llc29kv7.fsf@yertle.int.kciLink.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
>>>>> "JB" == Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>> FYI ... the 750s, 1850s and 2850s use Intel chipsets (E7520 on 1850s
>> and 2850s, 7210 on 750s), Intel NICs, and come only with LSI Logic
>> RAID controllers. It looks like Dell has dropped the
>> Broadcom/ServerWorks and Adaptec junk.
JB> I don't know if Vivek is on this list; I think he just had a
JB> critical failure with one of the new Dells with LSI.
I'm here, but time delayed :-)
No critical failures on the Dell, just performance failure. It can't
keep up. You'd think with a box like this:
4GB RAM
Dual Xeon (32 bit)
PERC3 (LSI based controller) dual channel
chan0: RAID1 two disks for OS + pg_xlog
chan1: RAID5 14 disks U320 18Gb
FreeBSD 4.10
PG 7.4.6
I should get better than a sustained 6MB/s I/O throughput with peaks
to 30MB/s and about 30% the tracks/sec others report with name-brand
LSI controllers with Opteron systems.
The computer is wicked fast, but the I/O can't hold up, and I can't
get a straight answer as to why.
I'm no closer to solving the vendor problem than anyone else here.
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc.
Internet: khera(at)kciLink(dot)com Rockville, MD +1-301-869-4449 x806
AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-12-13 17:23:13 | Re: Hardware purchase question |
Previous Message | Alvaro Nunes Melo | 2004-12-13 17:17:49 | Similar tables, different indexes performance |