| From: | Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Linux ready for high-volume databases? |
| Date: | 2003-08-27 18:15:24 |
| Message-ID: | x7fzjnotkz.fsf@yertle.int.kciLink.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
>>>>> "GS" == Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
>> The DB is currently about 27Mb on disk (including indexes) and
>> processes several million inserts and updates daily, and a few million
>> deletes once every two weeks.
GS> Oh, it's a really small database. That helps a lot with the backup
GS> problems of 24x7 operation. Still I would be interested.
Ok... so I re-read my post. I mean 27Gb on disk. Duh. Sorry for the
confusion!
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc.
Internet: khera(at)kciLink(dot)com Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497
AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2003-08-27 18:34:19 | Re: Linux ready for high-volume databases? |
| Previous Message | Ron Johnson | 2003-08-27 17:40:11 | Re: postgresql not using index even though it's faster |