From: | Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: vacuum locking |
Date: | 2003-10-22 18:46:26 |
Message-ID: | x78yndcdq5.fsf@yertle.int.kciLink.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
>>>>> "RN" == Rob Nagler <nagler(at)bivio(dot)biz> writes:
RN> This solution doesn't really fix the fact that VACUUM consumes the
RN> disk while it is running. I want to avoid the erratic performance on
RN> my web server when VACUUM is running.
What's the disk utilization proir to running vacuum? If it is
hovering around 95% or more of capacity, of course you're gonna
overwhelm it.
This ain't Star Trek -- the engines can't run at 110%, Cap'n!
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc.
Internet: khera(at)kciLink(dot)com Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497
AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Medora Schauer | 2003-10-22 20:56:33 | Re: slow select |
Previous Message | Vivek Khera | 2003-10-22 18:44:52 | Re: vacuum locking |