From: | Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: transactions on Postgresql |
Date: | 2001-05-26 02:09:52 |
Message-ID: | x77kz4n9n3.fsf@yertle.kciLink.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
>>>>> "DR" == Dave Robinson <lachesis(at)ignmail(dot)com> writes:
>> my problem : if an insert fail, all following insert are aborted :-(
>>
>> NB : it's not necessary to me that ALL inserts , will be done
>> with succes.
>> my question is : if a BAD insert fail , how can i do for doing
>> other inserts who may be are GOOD ?
>>
>> thanks a lot for help ;-)
DR> You want to look at wrapping your do statement into an eval block you
DR> can then capture the insert death in $@
Perl does not die; Postgres goes into ABORT STATE after the first
failure, and that is his problem. The only real way around this is to
not put the whole thing in a transaction.
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc.
Internet: khera(at)kciLink(dot)com Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497
AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nils Zonneveld | 2001-05-26 08:23:25 | Re: Simple SQL question, need help. |
Previous Message | Vivek Khera | 2001-05-26 02:01:22 | Re: Sessions with Postgres |