| From: | Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Quad Xeon vs. Dual Itanium |
| Date: | 2004-02-11 21:27:51 |
| Message-ID: | x74qtx9ui0.fsf@yertle.int.kciLink.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
>>>>> "JG" == John Gibson <gib(at)edgate(dot)com> writes:
JG> Hi, all.
JG> I need to upgrade my dual Xeon PostgreSQL engine.
JG> Assuming similar memory and disk sub-systems, I am considering a Quad
JG> Xeon system vs. a Dual Itanium for PostgreSQL. I believe that the
Save the money from the dual itanium or quad xeon and buy a dual xeon
but faster disks with a larger cache in the RAID controller, and
perhaps a dedicated RAID controller for the disk set that holds the
write-ahead log.
You're sure to find that you saturate the disk system faster than you
fill up even one CPU, let alone 4.
I assume that the box will be running *only* the database and any
other applications will run elsewhere.
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc.
Internet: khera(at)kciLink(dot)com Rockville, MD +1-301-869-4449 x806
AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rick Gigger | 2004-02-11 21:40:06 | Re: DB cache size strategies |
| Previous Message | Ian Harding | 2004-02-11 21:20:21 | Re: sybase->postgresql |