From: | Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: State of Beta 2 |
Date: | 2003-09-16 18:40:38 |
Message-ID: | x73cewy3tl.fsf@yertle.int.kciLink.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
>>>>> "MGF" == Marc G Fournier <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
MGF> On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
MGF> Just to add to this ... Bruce *did* start pg_upgrade, but I don't recall
MGF> anyone else looking at extending it ... if the *need* was so great,
MGF> someone would have step'd up and looked into adding to what was already
MGF> there ...
Hmmm, this is the math I just did in my head:
time to implement pg_upgrade = X
time to dump/restore once per year = Y
If X > Y*2 then why bother expending the effort? Now, if the X was
distributed over a bunch of people, perhaps it would make sense to me.
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc.
Internet: khera(at)kciLink(dot)com Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497
AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vivek Khera | 2003-09-16 18:47:25 | Re: State of Beta 2 |
Previous Message | Michele Laghi | 2003-09-16 18:03:25 | transaction abortion |