Re: State of Beta 2

From: Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: State of Beta 2
Date: 2003-09-16 18:40:38
Message-ID: x73cewy3tl.fsf@yertle.int.kciLink.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>>>>> "MGF" == Marc G Fournier <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:

MGF> On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

MGF> Just to add to this ... Bruce *did* start pg_upgrade, but I don't recall
MGF> anyone else looking at extending it ... if the *need* was so great,
MGF> someone would have step'd up and looked into adding to what was already
MGF> there ...

Hmmm, this is the math I just did in my head:

time to implement pg_upgrade = X
time to dump/restore once per year = Y

If X > Y*2 then why bother expending the effort? Now, if the X was
distributed over a bunch of people, perhaps it would make sense to me.

--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc.
Internet: khera(at)kciLink(dot)com Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497
AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vivek Khera 2003-09-16 18:47:25 Re: State of Beta 2
Previous Message Michele Laghi 2003-09-16 18:03:25 transaction abortion