| From: | Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: advice on raid controller |
| Date: | 2003-09-30 20:32:27 |
| Message-ID: | x71xtyqap0.fsf@yertle.int.kciLink.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
>>>>> "PG" == Palle Girgensohn <girgen(at)pingpong(dot)net> writes:
PG> Come to think of it, I guess a battery-backed cache will make fsync as
PG> fast as no fsync, right? So, the q was kinda stoopid... :-/
In my testing, yes, the battery cache makes fsync=true just about as
fast as fsync=false. it was only about 2 seconds slower (out of 4
hours) while doing a restore.
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc.
Internet: khera(at)kciLink(dot)com Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497
AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-10-01 04:28:50 | Re: Tuning/performance issue... |
| Previous Message | Vivek Khera | 2003-09-30 20:30:15 | Re: advice on raid controller |