Re: Re: JDBC Performance

From: Gunnar R|nning <gunnar(at)candleweb(dot)no>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Gunnar R|nning" <gunnar(at)candleweb(dot)no>, Peter Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk>, PGSQL-General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: JDBC Performance
Date: 2001-01-18 12:57:01
Message-ID: x6k87tdnmq.fsf@thor.candleweb.no
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-jdbc

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> Can you confirm that it is OK now? Your email from October 18th below
> seems to indicate it is not correct. Can I get a diff against the
> current CVS source that I can apply? Thanks. Sorry for the confusion.

It wasn't okay before I left to Kenya on 10 december. I notified Peter
about this before I went down there and I just came back two days ago, so
I'm not yet up to speed on the modifications.

... cvs update ...

The cvs update confirms that it is still _not_ okay. It is the first buggy
version of the code that is in there still. I will supply a new patch based
on the current CVS. Hopefully I will get some time tonight and on Sunday to
complete the patch.

regards,

Gunnar

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2001-01-18 13:56:07 Re: Re: postgresql.conf ignored
Previous Message Martin A. Marques 2001-01-18 12:46:56 Re: Errors compiling 7.0.3 on Solaris 7

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-01-18 17:51:48 Re: Re: JDBC Performance
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-01-17 21:21:07 Re: Re: JDBC Performance