Re: Re: JDBC Performance

From: Gunnar R|nning <gunnar(at)candleweb(dot)no>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Gunnar R|nning" <gunnar(at)candleweb(dot)no>, Peter Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk>, PGSQL-General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: JDBC Performance
Date: 2000-10-09 07:46:16
Message-ID: x63di6fodz.fsf@thor.candleweb.no
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-jdbc

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> Applied, and new files added.
>

Scares me ;-) I just wanted to get some feedback and testers for this code
before actually having it applied. I can also imagine Peter might have some
comments on structure etc. since he got a lot better overview of the JDBC
code as whole.

Well did anyone review the changes or test them out ? The application I'm
testing is hardly representative for all applications, so there may still
be some bugs left in there.

Regards,

Gunnar

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message andrew 2000-10-09 10:08:31 Making changes visible to other connections
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-10-09 07:38:42 Re: CIDR index use for '<<' operator

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Mount 2000-10-09 11:48:23 Re: Re: JDBC Performance
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-10-08 19:37:42 Re: Re: JDBC Performance