From: | <adnandursun(at)asrinbilisim(dot)com(dot)tr> |
---|---|
To: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 |
Date: | 2005-05-02 11:25:26 |
Message-ID: | web-96063001@mail3.doruk.net.tr |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Sun, 01 May 2005 22:23:19 +0300
Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net> wrote:
>On P, 2005-05-01 at 11:37 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>Im my case all ttransactions were implicit one command
functon calls
>("select * from dbfunc()"), so transaction timeout would
not help.
>
>probably the only way for server to detect stale
connections would be
>sending/receiving some kind of keepalives.
...and then clear stale connection. This would be nice
feature for PostgreSQL
Best Regards,
Adnan DURSUN
ASRIN Bilişim Hiz.Ltd.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvar Freude | 2005-05-02 11:32:18 | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 |
Previous Message | adnandursun | 2005-05-02 11:23:01 | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvar Freude | 2005-05-02 11:32:18 | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 |
Previous Message | adnandursun | 2005-05-02 11:23:01 | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 |