From: | "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Hey! ORDER BY in VIEWS? |
Date: | 2001-07-15 19:41:15 |
Message-ID: | web-85953@davinci.ethosmedia.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Pater, Robbie, Bruce,
> > Hey! I thought you couldn't do ORDER BY in views ... yet I just
> did.
> > Is this a new thing, or am I just getting my Trasact-SQL and my
> > PostgreSQL mixed up again?
>
> I think it was allowed from 7.1 on to enable LIMIT in views to work
> sensibly.
Makes sense. I take it that this is a deviation from the ANSI 92
standard, then?
What happens if I put an ORDER BY in a view, then call an ORDER BY in a
query, e.g.:
CREATE VIEW test_view AS
SELECT client_name, city, zip FROM clients
WHERE zip IS NOT NULL
ORDER BY zip;
SELECT * FROM test_view ORDER BY city;
Does the second ORDER BY override or suppliment the view ORDER BY, or is
it ignored?
-Josh
______AGLIO DATABASE SOLUTIONS___________________________
Josh Berkus
Complete information technology josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
and data management solutions (415) 565-7293
for law firms, small businesses fax 621-2533
and non-profit organizations. San Francisco
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robby Slaughter | 2001-07-15 20:02:43 | RE: Hey! ORDER BY in VIEWS? |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-07-15 19:30:29 | Re: Hey! ORDER BY in VIEWS? |