| From: | "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Timestamp operator error |
| Date: | 2002-02-26 05:20:02 |
| Message-ID: | web-810172@davinci.ethosmedia.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Tom,
> Well, you could delete the date(timestamp) function from pg_proc.
> However, that would prevent getting from timestamp to date even
> with an explicit cast --- so you might want to put it back after
> you've found all the trouble spots.
Hmmmm, no, that won't work, as lots of my functions have explicit
casts. Thanks anyway. Hopefully I don't have many more functions
where I call INTERVAL + TIMESTAMP; I just looked at several
time-sensitve functions and I'm pretty consistent with the other way
'round.
FMI, though, how difficult is defining an operator if I paid a C
programmer to do it?
-Josh Berkus
______AGLIO DATABASE SOLUTIONS___________________________
Josh Berkus
Complete information technology josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
and data management solutions (415) 565-7293
for law firms, small businesses fax 621-2533
and non-profit organizations. San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-02-26 05:31:29 | Re: Timestamp operator error |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-02-26 05:10:44 | Re: Timestamp operator error |