From: | "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Doug Silver <dsilver(at)quantified(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: "Hot Backups" |
Date: | 2002-02-12 21:43:10 |
Message-ID: | web-692137@davinci.ethosmedia.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
Doug,
> Would an alternative be to log all transactions to a file at the same
> time
> that you're making the call to the db? I was thinking of
> implementing
> that, but do you think it would be faster as a postgres function, or
> perhaps in the native language that's doing the front-end processing?
> I
> would think it would be the latter, and perhaps you could just fork a
> call
> to do just that. In my case I'd do it in perl, since that's what
> we're
> primarily using.
>
> While I agree with point #2, it is of little consolation if the
> information is for monetary transactions!
>
> Comments?
I'd be surprised if someone hasn't already done something like this.
As the very least, I'm pretty sure that there is a Perl-based
replication solution for PostgreSQL.
If there's not, I'd love to see you post your solution to /Contrib. I
think it's a great idea, and a quick-and-dirty solution to a problem
for which the bulletproof solution would require significant capital.
For true, immediate 100% availability, I'd reccommend building two
databases on two different machines and writing to both from
middleware calls (like from Perl::DBI).
-Josh
______AGLIO DATABASE SOLUTIONS___________________________
Josh Berkus
Complete information technology josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
and data management solutions (415) 565-7293
for law firms, small businesses fax 621-2533
and non-profit organizations. San Francisco
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-02-12 21:45:13 | Re: varchar vs char vs text |
Previous Message | Brett W. McCoy | 2002-02-12 21:01:34 | Re: varchar vs char vs text |