From: | "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Markus Bertheau <twanger(at)bluetwanger(dot)de>, postgres sql list <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: why can a named subselect not be used in a where |
Date: | 2002-01-24 17:58:56 |
Message-ID: | web-675145@davinci.ethosmedia.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Markus,
> cenes_test=> select personen.*, (select max(last_visit) from sessions
> where sessions.personen_id = personen.personen_id) as max from
> personen
> where max between 1009148400 and 1011913200 order by max desc;
> ERROR: Attribute 'max' not found
>
> I again think that the table structure is not neccesary to understand
> my
> question.
>
> Well, why can't I use max in the where clause?
There's two problems with the above query that have nothing to do with
named subselects, which are well-supported by PostgreSQL (in fact, as
of 7.1.3, Postgres has better support for subselects of all sorts than
any other major RDBMS platform).
1. "Max" is a reserved word in SQL. You are confusing the parser.
Pick another name.
2. While you are already aware that the example query is not the most
efficient construction, I also think you are doing your aliasing in
the wrong place:
select personen.*, (select max(last_visit) as max_visit from sessions
where sessions.personen_id = personen.personen_id) from
personen
... but I could be wrong, as I almost never find any reason to use a
sub-select in the SELECT line.
-Josh
______AGLIO DATABASE SOLUTIONS___________________________
Josh Berkus
Complete information technology josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
and data management solutions (415) 565-7293
for law firms, small businesses fax 621-2533
and non-profit organizations. San Francisco
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Markus Bertheau | 2002-01-24 18:00:45 | auto group by |
Previous Message | Markus Bertheau | 2002-01-24 17:40:30 | why can a named subselect not be used in a where condition? |