From: | "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Huh? Data typing bug? |
Date: | 2001-06-05 01:56:36 |
Message-ID: | web-67096@davinci.ethosmedia.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Tom,
> IIRC, number of days (as an int) is what that's supposed to produce.
>
> If that's not what you wanted, maybe you ought to cast the dates to
> timestamp or some such.
I see. It was never made clear to me that here the DATE type differs
from DATETIME and TIMESTAMP significantly.
This makes some sort of sense, now.
Correct me if I'm wrong:
DATE + INT4 = DATE
DATE - DATE = INT4
But:
DATETIME + INTERVAL = DATETIME
DATETIME - DATETIME = INTERVAL
-Josh
______AGLIO DATABASE SOLUTIONS___________________________
Josh Berkus
Complete information technology josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
and data management solutions (415) 565-7293
for law firms, small businesses fax 621-2533
and non-profit organizations. San Francisco
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2001-06-05 03:19:25 | Re: SQL Date Challenge |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-06-05 01:25:11 | Re: Huh? Data typing bug? |