From: | "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SQL99 |
Date: | 2001-11-06 21:10:43 |
Message-ID: | web-500130@davinci.ethosmedia.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Folks,
> Yeah. Considering that no vendor has yet to implement full SQL-92 I
> guess
> it will take a long time before anyone complies to full SQL-99...
Plus some folks don't think SQL99 was such a keen idea. Kline, Kline &
Kline from O'Reilly, for example, seem to think that most of the changes
between the two versions were vendor-inspired and don't do anything to
improve database-building. For example, the huge focus on BLOB support
in SQL 99 begs the question: Should BLOBs be stored in the database at
all? Many DBAs would say no ...
I'm sticking with SQL92.
-Josh
______AGLIO DATABASE SOLUTIONS___________________________
Josh Berkus
Complete information technology josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
and data management solutions (415) 565-7293
for law firms, small businesses fax 621-2533
and non-profit organizations. San Francisco
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | fstelpstra@yahoo.com | 2001-11-06 22:58:22 | Re: Design Tool for postgresql |
Previous Message | Christopher Sawtell | 2001-11-06 21:06:54 | Re: Design Tool for postgresql |