Re: One large v. many small

From: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Noah Silverman <noah(at)allresearch(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: One large v. many small
Date: 2003-01-31 05:55:40
Message-ID: web-2807562@davinci.ethosmedia.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-performance

Noah,

Well, there you have it: a unanimous consensus of opinion. You
should either combine all of your tables or not. But definitely one or
the other.

<grin>

Hope you feel informed now.

-Josh

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-01-31 06:00:45 Re: 2D arrays in 7.3... actually, parser bug?
Previous Message codeWarrior 2003-01-31 05:37:33 Re: Perl DBI and placeheld values

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shridhar Daithankar<shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in> 2003-01-31 06:27:40 Re: One large v. many small
Previous Message Curt Sampson 2003-01-31 04:02:52 Re: Postgres 7.3.1 poor insert/update/search performance