From: | "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | dev(at)archonet(dot)com, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, sqllist <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: List Concatination |
Date: | 2001-03-16 16:40:22 |
Message-ID: | web-25861@davinci.ethosmedia.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Richard,
> Sorry - issue was to do with the ordering of the concatenation, not
> the
> user-defined aggregates (iirc - it's getting late here).
>
> I do remember I got different orders when selecting and updating. In
> my
> case it didn't matter, and I'm guessing if the order reverses in your
> case when 8.x is released it's not the end of the world either.
As I said in my previous e-mail, I appear to have gotten the list to
order itself by basing it on an (ordered) sub-select. Since the DB is
only 50% populated right now, I'm not sure that's working perfectly but
I'll keep you posted.
> If
> you
> were joining words in a sentence, obviously it would matter (unless
> you
> were on usenet ;-)
illiterate posters newsgroup most calling you are?
-Josh Berkus
______AGLIO DATABASE SOLUTIONS___________________________
Josh Berkus
Complete information technology josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
and data management solutions (415) 565-7293
for law firms, small businesses fax 621-2533
and non-profit organizations. San Francisco
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-03-16 16:43:45 | Re: List Concatination |
Previous Message | Egbert Ellenkamp | 2001-03-16 12:15:28 | update table sequence |