Re: Upgrade to dual processor machine?

From: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Henrik Steffen" <steffen(at)city-map(dot)de>, <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Upgrade to dual processor machine?
Date: 2002-11-13 17:21:50
Message-ID: web-1824321@davinci.ethosmedia.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-performance

Henrik

Oops! Two corrections, below. Sorry about the typos.

> First off, I'm moving this discussion to the PGSQL-PERFORMANCE list,
> where it belongs. To subscribe, send the message "subscribe
> pgsql-perform your(at)email(dot)address" to "majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org".

Sorry ... thats "subscribe pgsql-performance your(at)email(dot)address".

> Then, of course, it becomes an interactive process. You change the
> settings, re-start the database server, and watch the memory used by
> the postgreSQL processes. Your goal is to have that memory usage
> hover around 700mb during heavy usage periods (any less, and you are

That's "600mb", not "700mb".

I also just read Tom's response regarding reserving more RAM for kernel
buffering. This hasn't been my experience, but then I work mostly
with transactional databases (many read-write requests) rather than
read-only databases.

As such, I'd be interested in a test: Calculate out your PostgreSQL
RAM to total, say, 256mb and run a speed test on the database. Then
calculate it out to the previous 600mb, and do the same. I'd like to
know the results.

In fact, e-mail me off list if you want further help -- I'm interested
in the outcome.

-Josh Berkus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas F.O'Connell 2002-11-13 17:23:38 news.postgresql.org outage
Previous Message scott.marlowe 2002-11-13 17:21:41 Re: index question..

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2002-11-13 21:45:34 Re: Query performance discontinuity
Previous Message scott.marlowe 2002-11-13 17:18:19 Re: Upgrade to dual processor machine?