From: | "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, John Proctor <jproctor(at)prium(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 16 parameter limit |
Date: | 2002-04-05 16:30:08 |
Message-ID: | web-1050295@davinci.ethosmedia.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches pgsql-sql |
Bruce,
> Actually, I said it didn't come up much, but I know of several heavy
> PL/pgSQL users who do have trouble with the 16 parameter limit, and I
> am
> looking into increasing it. If someone wants to do some legwork, go
> ahead. I do think it needs to be increases. The lack of complains
> makes it hard for me to advocate increasing it, especially if there
> is a
> disk space penalty, but personally, I do think it needs increasing.
Personally, as a heavy user of PL/pgSQL procedures, I'm not sure you
need to increase the *default* number of parameters. Postgres just
needs to implement a parameter number change as part of a documented
command-line compile-time option, i.e. "--with-parameters=32".
Currently, increasing the number of parameters requires altering the
C config files before compilation, a rather user-hostile process.
I've raised this point 3 or 4 times on this list now, and have not seen
a respons from you or Thomas on this suggestion. If I had the
skills, I'd do it myself and upload the changes, but C is not my
strong suit.
Also, what is the practical maximum number of parameters?
-Josh Berkus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-04-05 16:32:35 | Re: PQescapeBytea is not multibyte aware |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-04-05 16:19:04 | Re: timeout implementation issues |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-04-05 16:32:35 | Re: PQescapeBytea is not multibyte aware |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2002-04-05 16:16:01 | Re: PQescapeBytea is not multibyte aware |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2002-04-05 16:46:29 | Re: 16 parameter limit |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-04-05 15:42:18 | Re: Rule trouble (looks to me exactly like the example) |