| From: | Brandon Craig Rhodes <brandon(at)oit(dot)gatech(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | result relation used anymore? |
| Date: | 2003-02-28 18:17:30 |
| Message-ID: | w6heaoz2v9.fsf@guinness.ts.gatech.edu |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
While learning how to read query trees, I have been puzzled by the
assertion in the manual that the :resultRelations of an INSERT holds
`the table (or view!) where the changes take effect,' because in all
of the INSERTs I have generated the resultRelation in fact appears
empty, and the destination of the INSERT appears as the first of the
range table entries. Do I misunderstand the query trees, or the
documentation, or both?
The documentation I quoted is at:
http://www3.us.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/7.3/postgres/querytree.html
--
Brandon Craig Rhodes http://www.rhodesmill.org/brandon
Georgia Tech brandon(at)oit(dot)gatech(dot)edu
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-02-28 19:51:49 | Re: Brain dump: btree collapsing |
| Previous Message | scott.marlowe | 2003-02-28 17:57:27 | Re: Brain dump: btree collapsing |