Re: Draft for basic NUMA observability

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>
Cc: Jakub Wartak <jakub(dot)wartak(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Draft for basic NUMA observability
Date: 2025-04-07 18:11:28
Message-ID: vaysruyqmke3watdqfo2q7oumdfxs4em7lfi6gpdm3fmwm27ix@upvv47h55aqu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2025-04-07 19:59:59 +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> This reminds me whether it's fine to have "os_page_num" as int. Should
> we make it bigint, perhaps?

Yes, that's better. Seems very unlikely anybody will encounter this in the
next few years, but it's basically free to use the larger range here.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bertrand Drouvot 2025-04-07 18:11:44 Re: Draft for basic NUMA observability
Previous Message Andres Freund 2025-04-07 18:00:43 Re: Modern SHA2- based password hashes for pgcrypto