Re: [HACKERS] Scripts again

From: "Henry B(dot) Hotz" <hotz(at)jpl(dot)nasa(dot)gov>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Jan Wieck <wieck(at)debis(dot)com>, vev(at)michvhf(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Scripts again
Date: 1999-10-14 15:47:30
Message-ID: v04020a1db42bab0d85c1@[137.78.84.130]
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 6:17 AM -0700 10/14/99, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>On Thu, 14 Oct 1999, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
>> (Btw., anyone else think a /etc/services entry is better than a hardwired
>> default port, at least on the libpq side of things? Of course, I'm not
>> sure about Windows here.)
>
>Would require root intervention to install, which is something that we've
>always avoided, and discouraged...

Wouldn't it make it harder to build test installations running on the same
machine as a production server?

Signature failed Preliminary Design Review.
Feasibility of a new signature is currently being evaluated.
h(dot)b(dot)hotz(at)jpl(dot)nasa(dot)gov, or hbhotz(at)oxy(dot)edu

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Henry B. Hotz 1999-10-14 16:07:12 Re: [DOCS] Business Plan for PostgreSQL book?
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-10-14 15:03:54 Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table