Re: [PORTS] Patch for m68k architecture

From: "Henry B(dot) Hotz" <hotz(at)jpl(dot)nasa(dot)gov>
To: "Oliver Elphick" <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PORTS] Patch for m68k architecture
Date: 1999-06-11 17:59:28
Message-ID: v04020a0db386fe3399d3@[137.78.84.130]
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports

At 8:29 AM -0700 6/10/99, Oliver Elphick wrote:
>This patch should enable 6.5 to build on Motorola 68000 architecture. It
>comes
>from Roman Hodek <Roman(dot)Hodek(at)informatik(dot)uni-erlangen(dot)de>.

Has anyone compared the Linux/m68k patch with the NetBSD/m68k patch (which
I believe was already included in 6.5)?

Also I have been trying to cross-post some traffic on the
port-mac68k(at)NetBSD(dot)org list to the PG-ports list and it hasn't been
appearing afaict. Am I just not looking carefully enough or is something
screwy?

Signature failed Preliminary Design Review.
Feasibility of a new signature is currently being evaluated.
h(dot)b(dot)hotz(at)jpl(dot)nasa(dot)gov, or hbhotz(at)oxy(dot)edu

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Don Baccus 1999-06-11 18:28:41 Re: [HACKERS] "DML"
Previous Message Massimo Dal Zotto 1999-06-11 17:49:19 patch for large queries

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Unprivileged user 1999-06-11 21:31:10 Port Bug Report: Errors in Subselect (two related bugs)
Previous Message Unprivileged user 1999-06-11 15:09:55 Port Bug Report: Error when using row-level locking from PL