Re: [HACKERS] Kerberos 5 breakage.

From: "Henry B(dot) Hotz" <hotz(at)jpl(dot)nasa(dot)gov>
To: "Matthew N(dot) Dodd" <winter(at)jurai(dot)net>, Tom Ivar Helbekkmo <tih+mail(at)Hamartun(dot)Priv(dot)NO>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Kerberos 5 breakage.
Date: 1998-05-20 18:38:51
Message-ID: v0313030bb188d3725103@[137.78.218.94]
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 11:02 AM -0700 5/20/98, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
>Also, allowing writes of single characters is bad; you incur a context
>switch each write. The client and server should be writing things into
>largish buffers and writing those instead of doing small writes.
>
>The existence of the following scare me...
>
>pqPutShort(int integer, FILE *f)
.
.
.

Can't these be defined as macros the way get/put stuff is done in stdio.h?

Signature failed Preliminary Design Review.
Feasibility of a new signature is currently being evaluated.
h(dot)b(dot)hotz(at)jpl(dot)nasa(dot)gov, or hbhotz(at)oxy(dot)edu

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthew N. Dodd 1998-05-20 18:46:59 Re: [HACKERS] Kerberos 5 breakage.
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 1998-05-20 18:28:16 AnonCVS ...