Re: [NOVICE] Re: Subject: Re: [GENERAL] A book for PgSQL? A need? yes? no?

From: lynch(at)cognitivearts(dot)com (Richard Lynch)
To: Bill Sneed <bsneed(at)mint(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-novice(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [NOVICE] Re: Subject: Re: [GENERAL] A book for PgSQL? A need? yes? no?
Date: 1999-02-16 00:06:03
Message-ID: v02140b06b2ee0be6ef74@[207.152.64.133]
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

At 12:58 PM 2/12/99, Bill Sneed wrote:

>If the docs for PHP3 were as good as PostgreSQL's my little project
>would be much further along but I see no reason why the folks at PG
>should make up for PHP's shortcomings.

I find the ca.php.net web-site to be extremely easy to use, and contains
everything I need to know...

The user contributions to the notes in particular are extremely valuable...

I prefer the PHP docs, myself...

Guess it's just a matter of taste.

-- "TANSTAAFL" Rich lynch(at)cognitivearts(dot)com webmaster@ and www. all of:
R&B/jazz/blues/rock - jademaze.com music industry org - chatmusic.com
acoustic/funk/world-beat - astrakelly.com sculptures - olivierledoux.com
my own nascent company - l-i-e.com cool coffeehouse - uncommonground.com

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Maxwell 1999-02-16 00:14:13 Re: [GENERAL] Two Machines - Question
Previous Message Richard Lynch 1999-02-16 00:06:02 Re: [NOVICE] Subject: Re: [GENERAL] A book for PgSQL? A need? yes? no?