| From: | Richard Hayward <richard(at)tortoise(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | function parameters : bug? |
| Date: | 2005-07-10 10:52:10 |
| Message-ID: | ugu1d19614tuteki2jgm0496d58kcggdhn@4ax.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql |
pg 8.0.3
This behaviour seems odd to me:
CREATE TABLE mytable (
inta INTEGER
);
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION myfunction (inta integer) RETURNS integer
AS
$body$
begin
insert into mytable(inta) values (inta);
return(0);
end;
$body$
LANGUAGE 'plpgsql';
select myfunction(123);
ERROR: syntax error at or near "$1" at character 22
QUERY: insert into myTable( $1 ) values ( $2 )
CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function "myfunction" line 2 at SQL statement
The problem is with the line in my myfunction:
insert into mytable(inta) values (inta);
The server doesn't like the field name being the same as the name of
the function parameter. I don't see why, as I can see no opportunity
for ambiguity.
Problem vanishes with a different function parameter name:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION myfunction (my_inta integer) RETURNS
integer
AS $body$ begin
insert into myTable(inta) values (my_inta);
return(0);
end;
$body$
LANGUAGE 'plpgsql'
But, this means that if I change the design of my tables, I have to
possibly change my function headers rather than merely the code inside
them.
regards
Richard
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Harald Fuchs | 2005-07-10 12:19:56 | Re: Make COUNT(*) Faster? |
| Previous Message | Mischa Sandberg | 2005-07-10 01:00:36 | Re: getting back autonumber just inserted |