From: | Laura Smith <n5d9xq3ti233xiyif2vp(at)protonmail(dot)ch> |
---|---|
To: | Zahir Lalani <ZahirLalani(at)oliver(dot)agency> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Multi-master replication |
Date: | 2021-08-13 09:46:36 |
Message-ID: | u13RKkbT2qJqho2kimhLGIBjXWYF8ztHM3XzRCjQh4j5QNlHNp8awT6HzBF7nK2K0L9nMid0kcIYsAUSZ-9a4s1gJOt6vNn4aSpyH540Vf0=@protonmail.ch |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Friday, August 13th, 2021 at 9:00 AM, Zahir Lalani <ZahirLalani(at)oliver(dot)agency> wrote:
> Confidential
>
> Hello all
>
> Does anyone on the list have production experience of using PG in a multi-master setup – if so using which tools?
>
> Thx
>
> Zahir
I have sometimes considered it, but it always struck me that given there is no first-class support for it, multi-master in postgres is just an opportunity for so many foot-guns to enable to things to go terribly, terribly wrong.
Maybe you need to look at something like CockroachDB which has a degree of Postgres syntax compatability (https://www.cockroachlabs.com/blog/why-postgres/) N.B. Not speaking from experience here, CockroachDB is something I've wanted to play with for a long time but never had the time !
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ram Charan Kallem | 2021-08-13 10:20:41 | RE: Multiple Postgres process are running in background |
Previous Message | Vijaykumar Jain | 2021-08-13 09:02:16 | Re: Partitioning a table by integer value (preferably in place) |