Re: Upgrading 9.1.17 to which version?

From: nigel(dot)andersen(at)gmx(dot)com
To: psql-general <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Upgrading 9.1.17 to which version?
Date: 2019-05-17 11:06:11
Message-ID: trinity-f760fc02-a48a-492b-8e54-13bb35621ad9-1558091171476@3c-app-mailcom-bs16
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


>>I spent most of yesterday trying to get 9.6.13 installed from the PostgreSQL Yum repository and finally >>got it working with the initdb stuff stored on a non-default dedicated partition (RAID10 array) only to >>find that psql didn't work and was complaining about a missing libpq.so.5. Not sure if that's a common >>problem?
>
>What packages did you install?

Initially, postgresql96.x86_64, postgresql96-server.x86_64, postgresql96-contrib.x86_64 all via Yum. Then when psql was complaining about the missing library, I also tried installing postgresql96-libs.x86_64 via yum, which reported "nothing to do". Despite naming the four packages, yum only appeared to actually install two of them, postgresql96-server and postgresql96-contrib. A search for libpq.so.5 after the various attempts to install showed nothing on the server. I then downloaded the postgresql96-libs-9.6.13-1PGDG.rhel7.x86_64.rpm direct from the repository and tried to install that on it's own via rpm but that reported that it was already installed.

In the end, I yum removed all postgresql related files and deleted any postgresql related files/directories on the file system then manually installed the libs rpm outside yum, before re-installing the original three packages and hey presto, all working fine this time around and yum list installed shows them all in the list of installed packages.
 
>>My (admittedly loose) logic tells me that upgrading from 9.1.x to 9.6.x is probably a safer option than >>making the leap up to 10.x or 11.x
>>
>No, not really.

Yup, moving straight to 11.x would definitely be a better long term bet and I may well try migrating one of these db's across to it now I've eeked out a bit of breathing space. 

>>but I wonder whether that might be an easier/more reliable option from an install and point of view and >>certainly preferable in the long term. Any advice on where to go?

>11.x would be best, since it's EOL is furthest in the future.
>9.6 would be best, because it's had more bug-fix releases.

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-05-17 13:30:05 Re: FATAL: SMgrRelation hashtable corrupted
Previous Message nigel.andersen 2019-05-17 11:04:16 Re: Upgrading 9.1.17 to which version?