| From: | "Karsten Hilbert" <Karsten(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | |
| Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Hilbert, Sebastian" <Sebastian(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade ?deficiency |
| Date: | 2013-11-20 13:36:08 |
| Message-ID: | trinity-e0d701f3-ee75-4a79-ad2a-f5f0423720ea-1384954567985@3capp-gmx-bs05 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
> Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> > Let me try to rephrase:
> >
> > Fact: pg_upgrade can NOT properly upgrade clusters which contain
> > databases that are set to "default_transaction_read_only on"
> >
> > Question: Is this intended ?
>
> I am pretty sure that this is an oversight and hence a bug.
oversight, yes ... I thought as much and was therefore a bit
cautious of calling it a bug, chose to name it "?deficiency" ;-)
Karsten
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Paul Jones | 2013-11-20 14:02:47 | Debugging extension with gdb? |
| Previous Message | Albe Laurenz | 2013-11-20 13:32:58 | Re: pg_upgrade ?deficiency |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2013-11-20 13:36:18 | Re: Data corruption issues using streaming replication on 9.0.14/9.2.5/9.3.1 |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-11-20 13:33:06 | Re: information schema parameter_default implementation |