Re: PostgreSQL suitable?

From: "Rakesh Kumar" <rakeshkumar464(at)mail(dot)com>
To: "Kellner Thiemo" <thiemo(dot)kellner(at)usb(dot)ch>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL suitable?
Date: 2017-12-19 14:20:07
Message-ID: trinity-c0bd9b9d-da5d-4bd3-b69f-ed723eafacaa-1513693207056@3c-app-mailcom-lxa04
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


I think with 100TB the biggest challenge will be taking backups. PG has no real incremental backups offered in Oracle or SQLServer.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Travers 2017-12-19 14:26:03 Re: PostgreSQL suitable?
Previous Message Kellner Thiemo 2017-12-19 14:07:00 PostgreSQL suitable?