| From: | myaddress(at)gmx-topmail(dot)de |
|---|---|
| To: | h-inoue(at)dream(dot)email(dot)ne(dot)jp |
| Cc: | pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: ODBC large binary data support |
| Date: | 2017-01-10 07:29:15 |
| Message-ID: | trinity-9133d25e-67d5-4a5e-96b0-40fc748215a0-1484033355550@3capp-gmx-bs27 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
<html><head></head><body><div style="font-family: Verdana;font-size: 12.0px;"><div class="signature">Dear Hiroshi Inoue,</div>
<div class="signature"> </div>
<div class="signature">The new update fixed my issues. It's also working with the 32-bit version now. The Microsoft documentation concerning SQL_NO_TOTAL is a little bit strange in my eyes. So, I don't know what the "correct" behavior is for the 32-bit version and data >2GB. My feeling teels me that SQL_NO_TOTAL is "correcter" than 0x7fffffff. So I'd say the current version is good.</div>
<div class="signature">When will you officially release it?</div>
<div class="signature"> </div>
<div class="signature">Thank you very much.</div></div></body></html>
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| unknown_filename | text/html | 769 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Inoue, Hiroshi | 2017-01-11 12:17:44 | Re: ODBC large binary data support |
| Previous Message | Inoue, Hiroshi | 2017-01-09 13:25:47 | Re: ODBC large binary data support |