From: | "philip taylor" <philtay51(at)mail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Amazon Redshift |
Date: | 2014-11-05 21:31:23 |
Message-ID: | trinity-482d08a0-5159-4ff8-9e81-ca489a66ccaf-1415223083403@3capp-mailcom-lxa15 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
<html><head></head><body><div style="font-family: Verdana;font-size: 12.0px;"><div>
<div>Hackers,<br/>
<br/>
do you think we should implement some of the functions offered by Amazon Redshift?</div>
<div> </div>
<div>http://docs.aws.amazon.com/redshift/latest/dg/c_SQL_functions.html</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Amazon Redshift is completely based on PostgreSQL, but they have implemented some features not currently available in PostgreSQL.<br/>
Given the fact that it's a successful customer-driven commercial project, one can easily guess that the functions they implemented are useful and requested by many users.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Phil</div>
</div></div></body></html>
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
unknown_filename | text/html | 708 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2014-11-05 21:42:15 | Re: Amazon Redshift |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2014-11-05 21:15:38 | Re: Tweaking Foreign Keys for larger tables |