From: | Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, "pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [pgsql-www] Software Patents |
Date: | 2005-04-23 08:23:48 |
Message-ID: | thhal-0l55FA8vTySck/VvqSxSBR3paCn62o/@mailblocks.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
Christopher Browne wrote:
>>I also strongly feel that the PostgreSQL community should express
>>their opinion freely. Speculations on what opinions a sponsor might or
>>might not have should really have no significance at all.
>
>
> This furthermore points to the "right answer" on this being that
> individuals that want to express their displeasure about certain
> political matters ought to simply do so.
>
> Expecting the PostgreSQL project to "have an opinion" when it's not an
> individual is a bit silly.
>
What I meant was that we as a group must be able to agree on public
statements without involving ourselves in speculations concerning
sponsor opinions.
Silly me. I thought that was plain obvious in this context.
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jean-Paul Argudo | 2005-04-23 09:06:54 | Re: [pgsql-www] Software Patents |
Previous Message | Christopher Browne | 2005-04-23 03:59:39 | Re: [pgsql-www] Software Patents |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jean-Paul Argudo | 2005-04-23 09:06:54 | Re: [pgsql-www] Software Patents |
Previous Message | Christopher Browne | 2005-04-23 03:59:39 | Re: [pgsql-www] Software Patents |