| From: | Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, topeakinniyi(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL still for Linux only? |
| Date: | 2005-03-11 14:11:07 |
| Message-ID: | thhal-0fz8NA4Goxyc4XKHFRvBnroDkC65Drg@mailblocks.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Richard Huxton wrote:
> It can also be bad - the more time spent supporting Windows, the less
> time is spent working on PostgreSQL itself.
>
Unless the Windows support attracts more resources. Personally I'd be
surprised if that's not the case.
> That's clearly a decision only you can make. Getting replication working
> on Windows will happen quicker the more people help. If all you want is
> an off-machine backup, perhaps look at PITR (see manuals for details).
>
If you're using a Java based client perhaps something like C-JDBC
http://c-jdbc.objectweb.org would help. It's known to run well with
PostgreSQL.
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | GIROIRE Nicolas (COFRAMI) | 2005-03-11 14:12:01 | Re: Convert Cursor to array |
| Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2005-03-11 14:00:52 | Re: Convert Cursor to array |