From: | Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Binary Cursors, and the COPY command |
Date: | 2004-07-27 11:28:55 |
Message-ID: | thhal-0Q9bhAYd/UNsDDyjznLWQVb9lU3V0FY@mailblocks.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
Oliver Jowett wrote:
> What features of 1.4 were you thinking of exploiting?
Well, the java.nio obviously :-)
java.nio provides a java.nio.CharBuffer. A java.lang.StringBuffer is
synchronized. The CharBuffer is not. Since the JDBC driver uses strings
in a lot of places some code could be rewritten to increase performance.
And I think that Mark (pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com) has a point. 90% of all
installations would get a performance boost if native byte order was
used. IMHO, it's all about an initial protocoll negotiation (which of
course must be done in network byte order).
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeroen T. Vermeulen | 2004-07-27 11:30:04 | Re: Binary Cursors, and the COPY command |
Previous Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2004-07-27 10:41:49 | Re: Binary Cursors, and the COPY command |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeroen T. Vermeulen | 2004-07-27 11:30:04 | Re: Binary Cursors, and the COPY command |
Previous Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2004-07-27 10:41:49 | Re: Binary Cursors, and the COPY command |