| From: | Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, Guy Decoux <ts(at)moulon(dot)inra(dot)fr> |
| Subject: | Re: Sketch of extending error handling for subtransactions in functions |
| Date: | 2004-07-29 14:56:44 |
| Message-ID: | thhal-0LqjkARugUNsH/g2P/9rOQql8O6zKSh@mailblocks.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
>Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>
>
>>PL/sh is OK, but both PL/Ruby and PL/Java play around with Warn_restart.
>>
>>
>
>Are they using it to fake try/catch behavior? If so, see later thread
>about moving to a simple set of try/catch macros.
>
>I currently have this up and seemingly working for the main backend,
>but I still need to look at revising pltcl and plpython to match.
>I think that will be straightforward, but you never know till it's
>done...
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
I'm using macros to fake try/catch behavior in PL/Java. I see no
immedate problem switching to a supported version of the macros.
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Matthew T. O'Connor | 2004-07-29 15:21:29 | Re: extra info on autovaccum log |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2004-07-29 14:51:52 | Re: more signals (was: Function to kill backend) |