| From: | "Thomas Hallgren" <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Question regarding dynamic_library_path |
| Date: | 2004-06-09 14:37:56 |
| Message-ID: | thhal-09LiiAT//Tdswk0KNg0hL0AcT0EdiTI@mailblocks.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I agree. I wasn't aware of that restriction.
regards,
Thomas Hallgren
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Thomas Hallgren" <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 15:56
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Question regarding dynamic_library_path
> "Thomas Hallgren" <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com> writes:
> > And only the super user can use directory components in a module name?
>
> Only superusers can create C functions in the first place, so quibbling
> about what paths they can use doesn't seem that useful ...
>
> regards, tom lane
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Honza Pazdziora | 2004-06-09 14:43:38 | Re: [HACKERS] Refined LC_COLLATE or multiple database clusters? |
| Previous Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2004-06-09 14:23:19 | Re: Improving postgresql.conf |