| From: | "Thomas Hallgren" <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SPI_fnumber is case sensitive |
| Date: | 2004-05-06 12:17:01 |
| Message-ID: | thhal-058V1AduuE1wGw4wsKEOk8ax2ojwifn@mailblocks.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Didn't think you'd ever get such a result.
Using JDBC (wich has similar functionality), you don't need to worry about
case on identifiers.
regards,
Thomas Hallgren
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Thomas Hallgren" <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 2:09 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SPI_fnumber is case sensitive
> "Thomas Hallgren" <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com> writes:
> > The SPI_fnumber (returns the column number using a name) is case
sensitive.
>
> It's supposed to be. If it weren't, how would you cope with a result
> that contains both "x" and "X"?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-05-06 12:40:47 | Re: Is there any method to keep table in memory at startup |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-05-06 12:09:27 | Re: SPI_fnumber is case sensitive |