| From: | Thomas O'Connell <tfo(at)monsterlabs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Upgrading rant. |
| Date: | 2003-01-06 18:56:04 |
| Message-ID: | tfo-545BB1.12560406012003@news.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Exactly. I've got something that works and is, in fact, the recommended
method for upgrading, currently.
For me to switch, I'd need something in which the developers were
confident enough to recommend.
And even to test, I'd need something more than what is available right
now.
-tfo
In article <200301061836(dot)h06Ia4m27264(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us (Bruce Momjian) wrote:
> I think you are on to something here. Clearly dump/reload works, and
> testing pg_upgrade is time-consuming, so people aren't as inclined to
> jump into testing. It isn't quite like testing a bugfix or new feature.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dan Langille | 2003-01-06 19:00:21 | Re: New Portal in Place, DNS switched ... |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-01-06 18:51:11 | Re: New Portal in Place, DNS switched ... |