From: | Sean <iihero(at)qq(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Is there still password max length restrictions in PG? |
Date: | 2024-03-18 13:51:27 |
Message-ID: | tencent_DDB8F58E4291FA8FB5AD82AE317519A77E07@qq.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thanks Daniel.
That's a big help to me!
------------------ Original ------------------
From: "Daniel Gustafsson" <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>;
Date: Mon, Mar 18, 2024 09:49 PM
To: "Sean"<iihero(at)qq(dot)com>;
Cc: "pgsql-hackers"<pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>;
Subject: Re: Is there still password max length restrictions in PG?
> On 18 Mar 2024, at 14:43, Sean <iihero(at)qq(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Thanks for your information. Even using SCRAM, when specified the content of "password", still there is a basic request about the length of it. From the source code, seems there is no restriction, right?
SCRAM stores a hashed fixed-size representation of the password, so there is no
restriction in terms of length on the user supplied secret.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2024-03-18 13:52:28 | Re: speed up a logical replica setup |
Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2024-03-18 13:49:58 | Re: Is there still password max length restrictions in PG? |