Re: Historic snapshot doesn't track txns committed in BUILDING_SNAPSHOT state

From: cca5507 <cca5507(at)qq(dot)com>
To: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Historic snapshot doesn't track txns committed in BUILDING_SNAPSHOT state
Date: 2024-08-13 04:23:04
Message-ID: tencent_925A991463194F3C97830C3BB7D0A2C2BD07@qq.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

I refactor the code and fix the git apply warning&nbsp;according to [1].

Here are the new version patches.

--
Regards,
ChangAo Chen

[1]&nbsp;https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/Zrmh7X8jYCbFYXjH%40ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal

Attachment Content-Type Size
v3-0002-Add-test-case-snapshot_build-for-test_decoding.patch application/octet-stream 5.0 KB
v4-0001-Track-transactions-committed-in-BUILDING_SNAPSHOT.patch application/octet-stream 5.4 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2024-08-13 04:29:22 Re: Rename C23 keyword
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2024-08-13 04:18:37 Re: [bug fix] prepared transaction might be lost when max_prepared_transactions is zero on the subscriber