From: | cca5507 <cca5507(at)qq(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Historic snapshot doesn't track txns committed in BUILDING_SNAPSHOT state |
Date: | 2024-06-09 15:21:52 |
Message-ID: | tencent_6AAF072A7623A11A85C0B5FD290232467808@qq.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello hackers, I found that we currently don't track txns committed in
BUILDING_SNAPSHOT state because of the code in xact_decode():
/*
* If the snapshot isn't yet fully built, we cannot decode anything, so
* bail out.
*/
if (SnapBuildCurrentState(builder) < SNAPBUILD_FULL_SNAPSHOT)
return;
This can cause a txn to take an incorrect historic snapshot and result in an
interruption of logical replication. Consider the following scenario:
(pub)create table t1 (id int primary key);
(pub)insert into t1 values (1);
(pub)create publication pub for table t1;
(sub)create table t1 (id int primary key);
(pub)begin; insert into t1 values (2); (txn1 in session1)
(sub)create subscription sub connection 'hostaddr=127.0.0.1 port=5432 user=xxx dbname=postgres' publication pub; (pub will switch to BUILDING_SNAPSHOT state soon)
(pub)begin; insert into t1 values (3); (txn2 in session2)
(pub)create table t2 (id int primary key); (session3)
(pub)commit; (commit txn1, and pub will switch to FULL_SNAPSHOT state soon)
(pub)begin; insert into t2 values (1); (txn3 in session3)
(pub)commit; (commit txn2, and pub will switch to CONSISTENT state soon)
(pub)commit; (commit txn3, and replay txn3 will failed because its snapshot cannot see table t2)
The output of pub's log:
ERROR: could not map filenumber "base/5/16395" to relation OID
Is this a bug? Should we also track the txns committed in BUILDING_SNAPSHOT state?
--
Regards,
ChangAo Chen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nathan Bossart | 2024-06-09 19:04:17 | Re: problems with "Shared Memory and Semaphores" section of docs |
Previous Message | Nitin Jadhav | 2024-06-09 15:05:08 | Re: Show WAL write and fsync stats in pg_stat_io |