Re: Is this a Postgres Bug?

From: Xiong He <iihero(at)qq(dot)com>
To: Mike Christensen <mike(at)kitchenpc(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is this a Postgres Bug?
Date: 2012-08-05 09:13:09
Message-ID: tencent_43286FFA6A5C2EDA06BC850D@qq.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Seems this is not a bug.
Although 32767 doesn't exceed the 2bit int range.
But (32767 + 10) exceed the signed 2bit int range.
If you want to add index for the sum of the 2 columns, why don't you add a new column with a larger range (int32) ?

------------------ Original ------------------
From: "Mike Christensen"<mike(at)kitchenpc(dot)com>;
Date: Sun, Aug 5, 2012 01:14 PM
To: "pgsql-general"<pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>;

Subject: [GENERAL] Is this a Postgres Bug?

First off, I've posted this question on StackOverflow in case anyone
wants to answer it:

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11814132/postgresql-smallint-overflowing-when-creating-index-on-multiple-columns-is-th

The repro can be found here: http://sqlfiddle.com/#!1/734d7/1

I'm happy to log this as a bug, unless someone can explain to me why
this behavior is by design. Thanks!

Mike

--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2012-08-05 12:29:07 Re: Is this a Postgres Bug?
Previous Message Mike Christensen 2012-08-05 05:14:06 Is this a Postgres Bug?