Re: hi,postgresql bug

From: timi <xiao(dot)timi(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: hi,postgresql bug
Date: 2013-12-22 14:09:19
Message-ID: tencent_3A2BAD393CC4A417690243DD@qq.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

thank you very much

------------------ Original ------------------
From: "Bruce Momjian";
Date: 2013年12月17日(星期二) 晚上10:56
To: "xiao.timi";
Cc: "pgsql-bugs";
Subject: Re: [BUGS] hi,postgresql bug

On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 09:41:18AM +0800, timi wrote:
>
> hi,how are you,
>
> mysql have replace into
>
> oracle have Merge into
>
> postgresql not have

Yes, we know we are missing that, and it is on our TODO list.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message jp.deplaix 2013-12-23 00:47:16 BUG #8696: Type-checking seems to fail on UNIONs with arrays
Previous Message chris 2013-12-22 01:56:13 BUG #8695: Reloading dump fails at COMMENT ON EXTENSION plpgsql