Re: Is there still password max length restrictions in PG?

From: Sean <iihero(at)qq(dot)com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is there still password max length restrictions in PG?
Date: 2024-03-18 13:43:27
Message-ID: tencent_3921CBF0F4E7AE33153AD4B7AC4D14448C0A@qq.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,&nbsp;
Thanks for your information.&nbsp; Even using SCRAM,&nbsp; when specified the content of "password",&nbsp; still there is a basic request about the length of it.&nbsp; From the source code, seems there is no restriction, right? 

Is it reasonable? 

BR,
Sean He

------------------&nbsp;Original&nbsp;------------------
From: "Daniel Gustafsson" <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se&gt;;
Date:&nbsp;Mon, Mar 18, 2024 09:33 PM
To:&nbsp;"Sean"<iihero(at)qq(dot)com&gt;;
Cc:&nbsp;"pgsql-hackers"<pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org&gt;;
Subject:&nbsp;Re: Is there still password max length restrictions in PG?

&gt; On 18 Mar 2024, at 14:29, Sean <iihero(at)qq(dot)com&gt; wrote:

&gt; Need some document to make a clarification or suggestion to the user?

The suggestion is to not use password authentication but instead use SCRAM.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2024-03-18 13:49:58 Re: Is there still password max length restrictions in PG?
Previous Message Étienne BERSAC 2024-03-18 13:37:13 Re: REVOKE FROM warning on grantor