From: | Sean <iihero(at)qq(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Is there still password max length restrictions in PG? |
Date: | 2024-03-18 13:43:27 |
Message-ID: | tencent_3921CBF0F4E7AE33153AD4B7AC4D14448C0A@qq.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
Thanks for your information. Even using SCRAM, when specified the content of "password", still there is a basic request about the length of it. From the source code, seems there is no restriction, right?
Is it reasonable?
BR,
Sean He
------------------ Original ------------------
From: "Daniel Gustafsson" <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>;
Date: Mon, Mar 18, 2024 09:33 PM
To: "Sean"<iihero(at)qq(dot)com>;
Cc: "pgsql-hackers"<pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>;
Subject: Re: Is there still password max length restrictions in PG?
> On 18 Mar 2024, at 14:29, Sean <iihero(at)qq(dot)com> wrote:
> Need some document to make a clarification or suggestion to the user?
The suggestion is to not use password authentication but instead use SCRAM.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2024-03-18 13:49:58 | Re: Is there still password max length restrictions in PG? |
Previous Message | Étienne BERSAC | 2024-03-18 13:37:13 | Re: REVOKE FROM warning on grantor |