From: | 盏一 <w(at)hidva(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | andres freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: use `proc->pgxactoff` as the value of `index` in `ProcArrayRemove()` |
Date: | 2021-06-12 04:52:13 |
Message-ID: | tencent_266A74223032496338317CC7@qq.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Ok! Thanks
----------
--------------原始邮件--------------
发件人:"Andres Freund "<andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>;
发送时间:2021年6月12日(星期六) 中午12:43
收件人:"盏一" <w(at)hidva(dot)com>;
抄送:"pgsql-hackers "<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>;
主题:Re: use `proc->pgxactoff` as the value of `index` in `ProcArrayRemove()`
-----------------------------------
Hi,
On 2021-05-07 04:36:25 +0800, 盏一 wrote:
> &gt;&nbsp;Sounds like a plan! Do you want to write a patch?
> Add the patch.
Thanks for the patch. I finally pushed an edited version of it. There
were other loops over ->pgprocnos, so I put assertions in those - that
gains us a a good bit more checking than we had before...
I also couldn't resist to do some small formatting cleanups - I found
the memmove calls just too hard to read.
I took the authorship information as you had it in the diff you attached
- I hope that's OK?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2021-06-12 05:12:12 | Re: A new function to wait for the backend exit after termination |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2021-06-12 04:42:55 | Re: use `proc->pgxactoff` as the value of `index` in `ProcArrayRemove()` |