From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_start_backup and pg_stop_backup Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make CheckRequiredParameterValues() depend upon correct |
Date: | 2010-04-28 16:44:52 |
Message-ID: | t2l603c8f071004280944oa58e686du51954401cf2c4bde@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> At least as I understand it, even when not using
>> archive_mode, streaming replication, or hot standby, it's still
>> perfectly legal to use pg_start_backup() to take a hot backup.
>
> Nope. The correct procedure to take a hot backup is described in
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/interactive/continuous-archiving.html#BACKUP-TIPS.
> It involves setting archive_mode=on, and archive_command to a shell
> command that normally just returns true, except when backup is in
> progress. You can't take a hot backup without archiving (or streaming)
> at least temporarily. (except with filesystem-level snapshot capabilities).
Oh. Well, in that case the proposed change seems reasonable... but
what do you mean by "except with filesystem-level snapshot
capabilities"?
...Robert
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2010-04-28 17:22:46 | Re: pg_start_backup and pg_stop_backup Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make CheckRequiredParameterValues() depend upon correct |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-04-28 16:38:46 | Re: Add column if not exists (CINE) |