Re: proposal: schema variables

From: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, DUVAL REMI <REMI(dot)DUVAL(at)cheops(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposal: schema variables
Date: 2024-11-10 17:41:07
Message-ID: ssk7uqvu7rirq4vl4ns7vvr5efvgqwpuonu3qpfl6tem7ypifw@jchzp34fhqje
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

> On Sun, Nov 10, 2024 at 05:19:09PM GMT, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> ne 10. 11. 2024 v 16:24 odesílatel Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
> napsal:
>
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Thanks for continuing this work. As a side note, I would like to mention
> > how strange the situation in this CF item is. If I understand correctly,
> > there are two hackers threads discussing the same patch, with recent
> > patches posted in both of them. This is obviously confusing, e.g. the
> > main concern from another thread, about names clashing, wasn't even
> > mentioned in this one. Is it possible to reconcile development in one
> > thread?
> >
>
> This is probably my error. I don't try to organize threads, just I'll try
> to reply in the thread where I got a question.

It's fine. I just would appreciate some clarity about which patch to
look at. To confirm, the series in this thread contains everything from
the other one, plus some improvements, right?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2024-11-10 17:51:40 Re: proposal: schema variables
Previous Message Ilia Evdokimov 2024-11-10 16:51:09 Re: Vacuum statistics

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2024-11-10 17:51:40 Re: proposal: schema variables
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2024-11-10 16:19:09 Re: proposal: schema variables