From: | Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, DUVAL REMI <REMI(dot)DUVAL(at)cheops(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: proposal: schema variables |
Date: | 2024-11-10 17:41:07 |
Message-ID: | ssk7uqvu7rirq4vl4ns7vvr5efvgqwpuonu3qpfl6tem7ypifw@jchzp34fhqje |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2024 at 05:19:09PM GMT, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> ne 10. 11. 2024 v 16:24 odesílatel Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
> napsal:
>
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Thanks for continuing this work. As a side note, I would like to mention
> > how strange the situation in this CF item is. If I understand correctly,
> > there are two hackers threads discussing the same patch, with recent
> > patches posted in both of them. This is obviously confusing, e.g. the
> > main concern from another thread, about names clashing, wasn't even
> > mentioned in this one. Is it possible to reconcile development in one
> > thread?
> >
>
> This is probably my error. I don't try to organize threads, just I'll try
> to reply in the thread where I got a question.
It's fine. I just would appreciate some clarity about which patch to
look at. To confirm, the series in this thread contains everything from
the other one, plus some improvements, right?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2024-11-10 17:51:40 | Re: proposal: schema variables |
Previous Message | Ilia Evdokimov | 2024-11-10 16:51:09 | Re: Vacuum statistics |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2024-11-10 17:51:40 | Re: proposal: schema variables |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2024-11-10 16:19:09 | Re: proposal: schema variables |