Re: Important Info on comp.databases.postgresql.general

From: Rebecca Ore <spamtrapforore(at)NOHarvestverizon(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Important Info on comp.databases.postgresql.general
Date: 2004-11-10 01:19:15
Message-ID: spamtrapforore-6F210C.20140409112004@news.verizon.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

In article <Xns959C804EC266Abswr607h4(at)130(dot)133(dot)1(dot)4>,
Woodchuck Bill <bwr607(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:

> OK, so you think it is acceptable for anyone to create as many Big-8 rogue
> groups as they like? Some servers will carry the groups, others will not.
> There should be no accountability for someone doing this. There is nothing
> wrong with it.

Almost no servers create every group from every control message. Many
servers add groups that their customers request if there's a valid
control message somewhere, or if the group is carried by Google.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message A. Mous 2004-11-10 01:40:48 Transaction rollback - newbie
Previous Message Mike Wertheim 2004-11-10 01:02:01 Re: Trying to get postgres to use an index